Court dissolves 9-year-old marriage over frequent quarrel
An Ado-Ekiti Customary Court on Friday dissolved a nine-year-old marriage between Adeniyi Eiyebiokin and his wife, Adeola, for lack of affection, love and respect for parents.
Eiyebiokin, 31, an artist, told the court that Adeola had no respect for his parents and often quarrel with his mother. The father of one, said he was tired of the union because he could no longer leave under the same roof with a woman that he had no affection and love.
Eiyebiokin, 31, an artist, told the court that Adeola had no respect for his parents and often quarrel with his mother. The father of one, said he was tired of the union because he could no longer leave under the same roof with a woman that he had no affection and love.
He appealed to the court to dissolve his marriage
to Adeola to enable him have peace of mind and free from incessant quarrel with
his mother.
He further appealed to the court to award the
custody of his eight year old child to him
for proper upbringing.
Adeola, 29, a fashion designer, admitted all the
allegation and said that the petitioner sent
her packing in 2009. She said that she had a quarrel with his mother
and took her child into his custody at the age of one year and one month then.
Adeola told the court that since the incident
occurred in 2009, they had both lived separately.
The respondent, therefore, urged the court to
dissolve the union because she was no longer interested in the marriage. She, however, appealed to the court to ordered the
petitioner to pay the feeding and education of his child.
The respondent also prayed the court to award the
child in the custody of the petitioner’s
mother to her for proper care.
The President of the court, Mr Joseph Ogunsemi,
in his judgment observed that the marriage had broken down irretrievably and
consequently dissolved the marriage.
He awarded custody of the child to the
petitioner’s mother for proper upkeep
and upbringing.
Ogunsemi ordered the petitioner
to be responsible for the feeding and education of the child at all levels.
He, however, ruled that respondent should have
unrestricted access to the child.
NAN
Comments
Post a Comment